Australasian Evaluation Society Conference – Indigenous Speaker notes from Final Plenary Session
Introduce that a workshop was held on Monday for Indigenous people only
- Mix of ages, gender, occupations, experience, nationalities, ethnicities, tribes and clans
- Even with this diversity, some key common themes arose from our discussions, some of which have already been presented in Steve Larkin’s keynote and no doubt will also be picked up in Peter Mataira’s keynote
Power and control (and the relationship to ethics)
- Who has the power?
- Who controls the evaluation?
- At what point are community brought into the evaluation?
- And once brought in are they able to truly exercise any control over the information collected about them?
Theme 2 (Related to Theme 1)
Concerns around knowledge and expertise
Whose knowledge is privileged?
Who are the experts?
What happens when knowledge is shared in an evaluation process?
How much is ever returned to community to enable transformation and change?
Lots of discussion around the politics of evaluation and what happens when this is played out in the community.
And the purpose of evaluation:
- Is evaluation activity simply to ensure continuation of programme funding?
- Or are there bigger goals – wellbeing of a community for example”
Wrap-up and recommendations
- In addition to these high level, systems level issues participants also offered a number of directions to AES, from things it could do immediately to support community and Indigenous, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander evaluators
- An indigenous ethical framework, code of conduct, guidelines for those working with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities Greater emphasis on two-way learning
- Greater contact with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander organisations, including NACCHO More visibility in the community More training, education and support – from formal courses/workshops through to mentoring (for Indigenous and non-Indigenous)
- More Indigenous evaluators!